Track whether ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and Claude associate your firm with the right practice areas, jurisdictions, industries and credentials, and which firms appear instead.
See how it is measured →In-house teams and founders ask an assistant which firm handles a matter type in a jurisdiction. If AI does not connect your firm to that practice, you are off the shortlist before the RFP.
AI may know your firm exists yet still not recommend it for construction disputes, because the cited sources emphasise your corporate work. Being known is not being recommended.
The rankings AI leans on come from a narrow set of legal directories and publications. Presence and accuracy there directly shape which firms get named.
A configured product example. Firms shown are an illustrative set, not a published ranking.
These are the sources that decide the recommendation in your category. Seeno shows which ones cite you, and which ones do not.
Legal buyers act on specifics. Seeno flags where AI describes your firm incorrectly, so you can correct the record before it costs a mandate.
Strengthen a practice-area page with lawyer, matter, industry and jurisdiction evidence.
Align lawyer biographies with the question clusters you want to win.
Resolve inconsistent firm descriptions across the legal directories AI cites.
Publish authoritative answers on recurring regulatory questions in your target practice.
A tracked query is one buyer question in one market and one language, monitored across all five AI engines. Unlimited seats on every plan.